mahout-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: New logo
Date Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:33:46 GMT
I didn't mean to veto-

I thought we were on release rules. (at least three positives and more
positives than negatives).

If we're treating this as code modification (any -1 stops it dead) then I'm
somewhere in the ball park of -.75.


Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org

*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*


On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com> wrote:

> ok, the contest is cancelled
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 4:10 PM, Trevor Grant <trevor.d.grant@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'll revise to -1.  Given blue man v. all the others, I'd be indifferent.
> None of the new possibilities give me enough hope of something worth
> displacing blue man (dated though he may be, has good recognition).
>
> ^^ Assuming it take 3 votes to pass either way?
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
>
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
>
> > Fair enough, I think Trevor feels the same.
> >
> > The blue man can continue, all it takes is a -1
> >
> >
> > On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I don't have any constructive input at all. None of the proposals showed
> > any spark (to me).
> >
> > I hate it when I can't suggest a better path and I hate negative
> feedback.
> > But there it is.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Do you have constructive input (guidance or opinion is welcome input) or
> >> would you like to discontinue the contest. If the later, -1 now.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I thought that none of the proposals were worth continuing with.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, -1 means you hate them all or think the designers  are not worth
> >>> paying. We have to pay to continue, I’ll foot the bill (donations
> >>> appreciated) but don’t want to unless people think it will lead to
> >>> something. For me there are a couple I wouldn’t mind seeing on the web
> >> site
> >>> or swag and yes we do have time to try something completely different,
> >> and
> >>> the designers will be more willing since there is a guaranteed payout.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:30 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> >> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I thought we were just voting on continuing this process :)
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Trevor Grant <
> trevor.d.grant@gmail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Also Pat, thank you for organizing.
> >>>>
> >>>> +0
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't love any of them enough to +1, I don't hate them all enough
to
> >> -1
> >>>>
> >>>> Most of them remind me of some spin on Apache Apex, Python, Numpy (a
> >>> Python
> >>>> Library), or IBM's DSX.  However, I realize a big part of that is the
> >>>> colors chosen.
> >>>>
> >>>> #143 is my favorite (possibly because it reminds me of none of the
> >>> above).
> >>>> But possibly if this goes to next round we can have them adjust hues
/
> >>>> colors.
> >>>>
> >>>> Trevor Grant
> >>>> Data Scientist
> >>>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> >>>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> >>>> http://trevorgrant.org
> >>>>
> >>>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."
> -Virgil*
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 to continue; thanks for organizing this Pat!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My personal favorite is #38
> >>>>> https://images-platform.99static.com/I9quDzcBrtJXg_
> >>>> NMaIsH6ySQ7Ok=/filters:
> >>>>> quality(100)/99designs-contests-attachments/84/84017/
> >>> attachment_84017937
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I like the stylized and simple "M" and it reminds me of diagrams
> >> showing
> >>>>> vector multiplication.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> We can treat this like a release vote, if anyone hates all these
and
> >>>>>> doesn’t want to continue with shortlisted designers for 3
more days
> >>>> (the
> >>>>>> next step) vote -1 and say if your vote is binding (your are
a PMC
> >>>>> member)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Otherwise all are welcome to rate everything on the polls below.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In this case you have 24 hours to vote
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Here’s my +1 to continue refining.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Here is a second group, hopefully picked to be unique.
> >>>>>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/vl7xed
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We got a lot of responses, these 2 polls contain the best afaict.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Vote: https://99designs.com/contests/poll/rqcgif
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We asked for something “mathy” and asked for no elephant
and rider.
> > We
> >>>>>> have the rest of the week to tweak so leave comments about what
you
> >>>> like
> >>>>> or
> >>>>>> would like to change.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We don’t have to pick one of these, so if you hate them all,
make
> > that
> >>>>>> known too.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message