manifoldcf-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ameya Aware <ameya.aw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Query in Sharepoint connector
Date Wed, 09 Jul 2014 20:04:39 GMT
So what could be the solution on this now?

Thanks,
Ameya


On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ameya,
>
> Have a look at this one line:
>
> INFO  - 2014-07-09 15:30:56.243;
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor; [collection1]
> webapp=/solr path=/update/extract
> params={literal.deny_token_document=DEAD_AUTHORITY&literal.DocIcon=docx&
> resource.name
> =Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx&literal.allow_token_document=S-1-5-21-1482846375-2276666860-3536682573-500&literal.allow_token_document=S-1-5-21-1482846375-2276666860-3536682573-68651&literal.FolderChildCount=0&version=2.2&literal.ItemChildCount=0&literal.GUID=Ameya&literal.ParentVersionString=&literal._CopySource=&
> literal.cat
> =&literal.FileSizeDisplay=1264155&literal._CheckinComment=&literal.Edit=0&
> literal.id=
> http://sharepointten:10800/sites/siteecho/Shared%2520Documents/Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx&literal.LinkFilenameNoMenu=Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx&literal.Created=2014-06-03+11:21:53&literal._UIVersionString=1.0&wt=xml&literal.Title=Anarchism&literal.Modified=2014-06-03+11:21:53&literal.Author=Sharepoint+Backup&literal.FileLeafRef=Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx&literal.LinkFilename=Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx&literal.lcf_metadata_id=81&literal.Editor=Administrator&literal.ParentLeafName=&literal.CheckoutUser=&literal.ContentType=Document}
> {add=[
> http://sharepointten:10800/sites/siteecho/Shared%20Documents/Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx
> (1473180342671114240)]} 0 66
>
>
> Note that literal.Created and literal.Modified are both reasonable dates.
>
> So MCF is not supplying the last_modified field; probably that is being
> extracted by Solr Cell.
>
> Karl
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Karl,
>>
>> Please find attached solr log file.
>>
>> Please let me know if you need anything else.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ameya
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>
>>> I need to see the solr log output.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please see if you needed below information.
>>>>
>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>
>>>> Or please let me know where would i get information from.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ameya
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you include the Solr [INFO] log entry for one of these indexing
>>>>> actions?  I want to see if last_modified is set incorrectly there.  If
you
>>>>> are running these documents through Solr Cell, it may well be Tika that
is
>>>>> providing the last_modified date, not ManifoldCF.
>>>>>
>>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please find below screenshot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> looks like indexing date comes out to be good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, just for your reference pasting my Solr screenshot as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On second look, it all looks fine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The last thing to check is to look at what is getting set as
data.
>>>>>>> Around line 1996 in SharePointRepository, there is this code:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>                 if (modifiedDate != null)
>>>>>>>                   data.setModifiedDate(modifiedDate);
>>>>>>>                 if (createdDate != null)
>>>>>>>                   data.setCreatedDate(createdDate);
>>>>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you add this line:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>                System.out.println("Indexing modified date:
>>>>>>> "+modifiedDate);
>>>>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... and recrawl?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If that works, we'll have to start looking at Solr.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, looking at your screen shot, it is harder to see
for sure
>>>>>>>> since there are multiple threads active.  So it may well
be that there is
>>>>>>>> no issue with the parsing.  Let me see if I can confirm that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> how do i open the ticket?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> bq. How is that coming good?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No idea.  It may be a bug in the SimpleDateFormat
class
>>>>>>>>>>> pertaining to only specific dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But then same thing should happen in created
date also , isnt
>>>>>>>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How is that coming good?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Karl Wright
<daddywri@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This shows clearly that the parsing is
not doing the expected
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing.  It's not clear why, since it's
a pretty straight usage of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SimpleDateFormat, but that is what is
going wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please open a ticket for us to look at
this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Ameya
Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find screenshot below to show
modified date values as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date object and string as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM,
Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ability to parse Microsoft's
special 8601 dates is in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fact already there.  So what
might be happening is a timezone issue, since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the timezone is not being explicitly
set during parsing.  Printing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value of modifiedDateValue will
show us if that is indeed the problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:19
PM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try printing "modifiedDateValue",
in addition to printing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "modifiedDate".  The parsed
form is a date object, not a string.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:20
AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But created date for
all files is coming good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (modifyDate != null)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   //
Item has a modified date, so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presume it exists
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Date
modifiedDateValue =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date(modifiedDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Date
createdDateValue =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date(createdDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   System.out.println("Modified
date string
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is: '"+modifiedDate+"'");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   System.out.println("Modify
Date:" +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modifyDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Above code prints out
correct date even after parsing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is the issue coming
after this step??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using Sharepoint
2010.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at
11:10 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, well SharePoint
claims these dates are ISO8601 dates,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but they are clearly
not in this case.  Here are the tests for 8601 dates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the MCF core code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Date d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("96-11-15T01:32:33.344GMT");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33.344Z");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33Z");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33+0100");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33-03:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33GMT-03:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33.001-04:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You will note that
there is supposed to be a "T" and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timezone in an ISO-8601
date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What version of SharePoint
are you using, and what is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locale settings for
the server that your SharePoint is running on?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014
at 11:06 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find below
screenshot for dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modify Date i
added on my own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Inline
image 1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9,
2014 at 11:03 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The SharePoint
connector parses the date.  Can you send
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me some EXAMPLES
of the dates coming back so that I can be sure they will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parse correctly?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul
9, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I ran
the job and at this point values coming for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modified
date are correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed,
Jul 9, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
will provide instructions for how I'd like you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> research
this.  I don't suggest running under eclipse for this research.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Around
line 1047 in SharePointRepository.java, there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
this code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
               String modifiedDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Modified");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
               String createdDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Created");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
               String guid = values.get("GUID");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
               String modifyDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Last_x0020_Modified");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please
add this line:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
              System.out.println("Modified date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> string
is: '"+modifiedDate+"'");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please
run the job and send me some examples of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modified
date string.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On
Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
i am finding it difficult debug the code.. Whatever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
changes i do,i just build from scratch and check if changes are done or not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Can you help me with how can i debug this code? (i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
am using eclipse IDE)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Other users have had no trouble with this attribute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
in the past.  SharePoint, though, has been known to use non-ISO-8601-format
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
dates in some cases.  I wonder if this is one of those cases?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In order to determine this, you will need to edit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the code for the SharePoint connector and add debugging output.  Are you in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a position to do that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am seeing Shared documents from Sharepoint.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There is no difference in treatment between
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
created date and modified date that I can find in the connector.  Can you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
tell me what kind of SharePoint entity you are seeing this on?  Eg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
documents, list items, attachments?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From: Ameya Aware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent: 7/8/2014 3:41 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To: Karl Wright
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subject: Re: Query in Sharepoint connector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 I did not get you properly. Please see below if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
it satisfies your query.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Last modified is date field in Sharepoint. When i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
run job and send metadata to Solr, the date which is being sent to Solr is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
far different than that of it is in Sharepoint.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please let me know if you need any more details.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What does this field look like in SharePoint?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From: Ameya Aware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent: 7/8/2014 1:50 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To: dev@manifoldcf.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subject: Query in Sharepoint connector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Last_modified metadata sent from Sharepoint to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Solr is not giving correct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
values.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Even last_modified showing lesser value than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
created_by date. (Created_by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
date is coming good).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is this bug?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message