manifoldcf-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Query in Sharepoint connector
Date Wed, 09 Jul 2014 20:00:19 GMT
Hi Ameya,

Have a look at this one line:

INFO  - 2014-07-09 15:30:56.243;
org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor; [collection1]
webapp=/solr path=/update/extract
params={literal.deny_token_document=DEAD_AUTHORITY&literal.DocIcon=docx&
resource.name
=Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx&literal.allow_token_document=S-1-5-21-1482846375-2276666860-3536682573-500&literal.allow_token_document=S-1-5-21-1482846375-2276666860-3536682573-68651&literal.FolderChildCount=0&version=2.2&literal.ItemChildCount=0&literal.GUID=Ameya&literal.ParentVersionString=&literal._CopySource=&
literal.cat
=&literal.FileSizeDisplay=1264155&literal._CheckinComment=&literal.Edit=0&
literal.id=
http://sharepointten:10800/sites/siteecho/Shared%2520Documents/Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx&literal.LinkFilenameNoMenu=Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx&literal.Created=2014-06-03+11:21:53&literal._UIVersionString=1.0&wt=xml&literal.Title=Anarchism&literal.Modified=2014-06-03+11:21:53&literal.Author=Sharepoint+Backup&literal.FileLeafRef=Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx&literal.LinkFilename=Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx&literal.lcf_metadata_id=81&literal.Editor=Administrator&literal.ParentLeafName=&literal.CheckoutUser=&literal.ContentType=Document}
{add=[
http://sharepointten:10800/sites/siteecho/Shared%20Documents/Anarchism-201310091123505625.docx
(1473180342671114240)]} 0 66


Note that literal.Created and literal.Modified are both reasonable dates.

So MCF is not supplying the last_modified field; probably that is being
extracted by Solr Cell.

Karl



On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Karl,
>
> Please find attached solr log file.
>
> Please let me know if you need anything else.
>
> Thanks,
> Ameya
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ameya,
>>
>> I need to see the solr log output.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Karl
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please see if you needed below information.
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>> Or please let me know where would i get information from.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ameya
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>
>>>> Can you include the Solr [INFO] log entry for one of these indexing
>>>> actions?  I want to see if last_modified is set incorrectly there.  If you
>>>> are running these documents through Solr Cell, it may well be Tika that is
>>>> providing the last_modified date, not ManifoldCF.
>>>>
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find below screenshot.
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>
>>>>> looks like indexing date comes out to be good.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, just for your reference pasting my Solr screenshot as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On second look, it all looks fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The last thing to check is to look at what is getting set as data.
>>>>>> Around line 1996 in SharePointRepository, there is this code:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>                 if (modifiedDate != null)
>>>>>>                   data.setModifiedDate(modifiedDate);
>>>>>>                 if (createdDate != null)
>>>>>>                   data.setCreatedDate(createdDate);
>>>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you add this line:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>                System.out.println("Indexing modified date:
>>>>>> "+modifiedDate);
>>>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... and recrawl?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If that works, we'll have to start looking at Solr.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, looking at your screen shot, it is harder to see for
sure
>>>>>>> since there are multiple threads active.  So it may well be that
there is
>>>>>>> no issue with the parsing.  Let me see if I can confirm that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> how do i open the ticket?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> bq. How is that coming good?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No idea.  It may be a bug in the SimpleDateFormat
class
>>>>>>>>>> pertaining to only specific dates.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But then same thing should happen in created
date also , isnt it?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How is that coming good?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This shows clearly that the parsing is not
doing the expected
>>>>>>>>>>>> thing.  It's not clear why, since it's a
pretty straight usage of
>>>>>>>>>>>> SimpleDateFormat, but that is what is going
wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please open a ticket for us to look at this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Ameya Aware
<
>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find screenshot below to show
modified date values as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> date object and string as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Karl
Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ability to parse Microsoft's
special 8601 dates is in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fact already there.  So what might
be happening is a timezone issue, since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the timezone is not being explicitly
set during parsing.  Printing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value of modifiedDateValue will show
us if that is indeed the problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:19 PM,
Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try printing "modifiedDateValue",
in addition to printing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "modifiedDate".  The parsed form
is a date object, not a string.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:20
AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But created date for all
files is coming good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (modifyDate != null)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   // Item
has a modified date, so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presume it exists
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Date modifiedDateValue
=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date(modifiedDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Date createdDateValue
=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date(createdDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   System.out.println("Modified
date string
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is: '"+modifiedDate+"'");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   System.out.println("Modify
Date:" +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modifyDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Above code prints out correct
date even after parsing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is the issue coming after
this step??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using Sharepoint 2010.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:10
AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, well SharePoint claims
these dates are ISO8601 dates,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but they are clearly
not in this case.  Here are the tests for 8601 dates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the MCF core code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Date d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("96-11-15T01:32:33.344GMT");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33.344Z");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33Z");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33+0100");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33-03:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33GMT-03:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33.001-04:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You will note that there
is supposed to be a "T" and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timezone in an ISO-8601
date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What version of SharePoint
are you using, and what is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locale settings for the
server that your SharePoint is running on?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at
11:06 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find below
screenshot for dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modify Date i added
on my own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Inline image
1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014
at 11:03 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The SharePoint
connector parses the date.  Can you send
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me some EXAMPLES
of the dates coming back so that I can be sure they will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parse correctly?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9,
2014 at 10:59 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I ran the
job and at this point values coming for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modified
date are correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul
9, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will
provide instructions for how I'd like you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> research
this.  I don't suggest running under eclipse for this research.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Around
line 1047 in SharePointRepository.java, there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is this
code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     
           String modifiedDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Modified");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     
           String createdDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Created");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     
           String guid = values.get("GUID");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     
           String modifyDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Last_x0020_Modified");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please
add this line:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     
          System.out.println("Modified date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> string
is: '"+modifiedDate+"'");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please
run the job and send me some examples of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modified
date string.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed,
Jul 9, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
am finding it difficult debug the code.. Whatever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
i do,i just build from scratch and check if changes are done or not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can
you help me with how can i debug this code? (i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
eclipse IDE)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On
Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Other users have had no trouble with this attribute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
in the past.  SharePoint, though, has been known to use non-ISO-8601-format
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
dates in some cases.  I wonder if this is one of those cases?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In order to determine this, you will need to edit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the code for the SharePoint connector and add debugging output.  Are you in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a position to do that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am seeing Shared documents from Sharepoint.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There is no difference in treatment between
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
created date and modified date that I can find in the connector.  Can you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
tell me what kind of SharePoint entity you are seeing this on?  Eg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
documents, list items, attachments?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From: Ameya Aware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent: 7/8/2014 3:41 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To: Karl Wright
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subject: Re: Query in Sharepoint connector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 I did not get you properly. Please see below if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
it satisfies your query.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Last modified is date field in Sharepoint. When i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
run job and send metadata to Solr, the date which is being sent to Solr is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
far different than that of it is in Sharepoint.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please let me know if you need any more details.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What does this field look like in SharePoint?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From: Ameya Aware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent: 7/8/2014 1:50 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To: dev@manifoldcf.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subject: Query in Sharepoint connector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Last_modified metadata sent from Sharepoint to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Solr is not giving correct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
values.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Even last_modified showing lesser value than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
created_by date. (Created_by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
date is coming good).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is this bug?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message