manifoldcf-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Query in Sharepoint connector
Date Wed, 09 Jul 2014 19:07:24 GMT
Hi Ameya,

I need to see the solr log output.

Thanks,
Karl



On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please see if you needed below information.
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> Or please let me know where would i get information from.
>
> Thanks,
> Ameya
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ameya,
>>
>> Can you include the Solr [INFO] log entry for one of these indexing
>> actions?  I want to see if last_modified is set incorrectly there.  If you
>> are running these documents through Solr Cell, it may well be Tika that is
>> providing the last_modified date, not ManifoldCF.
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Karl,
>>>
>>> Please find below screenshot.
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>> looks like indexing date comes out to be good.
>>>
>>> Also, just for your reference pasting my Solr screenshot as well.
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ameya
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On second look, it all looks fine.
>>>>
>>>> The last thing to check is to look at what is getting set as data.
>>>> Around line 1996 in SharePointRepository, there is this code:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>                 if (modifiedDate != null)
>>>>                   data.setModifiedDate(modifiedDate);
>>>>                 if (createdDate != null)
>>>>                   data.setCreatedDate(createdDate);
>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>
>>>> Can you add this line:
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>                System.out.println("Indexing modified date:
>>>> "+modifiedDate);
>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>
>>>> ... and recrawl?
>>>>
>>>> If that works, we'll have to start looking at Solr.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Actually, looking at your screen shot, it is harder to see for sure
>>>>> since there are multiple threads active.  So it may well be that there
is
>>>>> no issue with the parsing.  Let me see if I can confirm that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how do i open the ticket?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> bq. How is that coming good?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No idea.  It may be a bug in the SimpleDateFormat class pertaining
>>>>>>>> to only specific dates.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Ameya Aware <ameya.aware@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But then same thing should happen in created date also
, isnt it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How is that coming good?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This shows clearly that the parsing is not doing
the expected
>>>>>>>>>> thing.  It's not clear why, since it's a pretty straight
usage of
>>>>>>>>>> SimpleDateFormat, but that is what is going wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please open a ticket for us to look at this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please find screenshot below to show modified
date values as
>>>>>>>>>>> date object and string as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Karl Wright
<daddywri@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The ability to parse Microsoft's special
8601 dates is in fact
>>>>>>>>>>>> already there.  So what might be happening
is a timezone issue, since the
>>>>>>>>>>>> timezone is not being explicitly set during
parsing.  Printing the value of
>>>>>>>>>>>> modifiedDateValue will show us if that is
indeed the problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Karl Wright
<
>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try printing "modifiedDateValue", in
addition to printing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "modifiedDate".  The parsed form is a
date object, not a string.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Ameya
Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But created date for all files is
coming good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (modifyDate != null)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   // Item has a modified
date, so we presume
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it exists
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Date modifiedDateValue
=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date(modifiedDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Date createdDateValue
=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date(createdDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   System.out.println("Modified
date string
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is: '"+modifiedDate+"'");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                   System.out.println("Modify
Date:" +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modifyDate);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Above code prints out correct date
even after parsing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is the issue coming after this
step??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using Sharepoint 2010.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:10 AM,
Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, well SharePoint claims these
dates are ISO8601 dates,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but they are clearly not in this
case.  Here are the tests for 8601 dates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the MCF core code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Date d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("96-11-15T01:32:33.344GMT");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33.344Z");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d = DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33Z");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33+0100");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33-03:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33GMT-03:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     d =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DateParser.parseISO8601Date("2012-11-15T01:32:33.001-04:00");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     assertNotNull(d);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You will note that there is supposed
to be a "T" and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timezone in an ISO-8601 date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What version of SharePoint are
you using, and what is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locale settings for the server
that your SharePoint is running on?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:06
AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find below screenshot
for dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modify Date i added on my
own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:03
AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The SharePoint connector
parses the date.  Can you send me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some EXAMPLES of the
dates coming back so that I can be sure they will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parse correctly?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at
10:59 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I ran the job and
at this point values coming for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modified date are
correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014
at 10:25 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will provide
instructions for how I'd like you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> research this.
 I don't suggest running under eclipse for this research.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Around line 1047
in SharePointRepository.java, there is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             
   String modifiedDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Modified");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             
   String createdDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Created");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             
   String guid = values.get("GUID");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             
   String modifyDate =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.get("Last_x0020_Modified");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please add this
line:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             
  System.out.println("Modified date string
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is: '"+modifiedDate+"'");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please run the
job and send me some examples of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modified date
string.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 9,
2014 at 10:13 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i am finding
it difficult debug the code.. Whatever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes i
do,i just build from scratch and check if changes are done or not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help
me with how can i debug this code? (i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using eclipse
IDE)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul
9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other
users have had no trouble with this attribute in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past.
 SharePoint, though, has been known to use non-ISO-8601-format
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dates
in some cases.  I wonder if this is one of those cases?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In order
to determine this, you will need to edit the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code
for the SharePoint connector and add debugging output.  Are you in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> position
to do that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed,
Jul 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ameya Aware <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ameya.aware@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
am seeing Shared documents from Sharepoint.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On
Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> daddywri@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi Ameya,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There is no difference in treatment between created
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
date and modified date that I can find in the connector.  Can you tell me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
what kind of SharePoint entity you are seeing this on?  Eg documents, list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
items, attachments?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From: Ameya Aware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent: 7/8/2014 3:41 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To: Karl Wright
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subject: Re: Query in Sharepoint connector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 I did not get you properly. Please see below if it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
satisfies your query.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Last modified is date field in Sharepoint. When i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
run job and send metadata to Solr, the date which is being sent to Solr is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
far different than that of it is in Sharepoint.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please let me know if you need any more details.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
daddywri@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What does this field look like in SharePoint?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From: Ameya Aware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sent: 7/8/2014 1:50 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To: dev@manifoldcf.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Subject: Query in Sharepoint connector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Last_modified metadata sent from Sharepoint to Solr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
is not giving correct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
values.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Even last_modified showing lesser value than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
created_by date. (Created_by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
date is coming good).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is this bug?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ameya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message