maven-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lukas Theussl (JIRA)" <j...@codehaus.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (MAVEN-1410) pom.artifactId is missing from XML schema and pom.id should be removed
Date Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:20:48 GMT
    [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1410?page=comments#action_72716 ] 
            
Lukas Theussl commented on MAVEN-1410:
--------------------------------------

The plugin-plugin-1.7 is indicated here: http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/pom/goals.html.
Please read http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/pom/validation.html (note however that's
it's not up to date anymore), you still have to indicate the namespace in the project root
element. BUILD SUCCESSFUL does not mean that the pom is valid, only that the validation procedure
succeded.

> pom.artifactId is missing from XML schema and pom.id should be removed
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAVEN-1410
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1410
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: model
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>            Reporter: Dennis Lundberg
>         Assigned To: Lukas Theussl
>             Fix For: 1.1-rc1
>
>         Attachments: maven-project-3.xsd.patch, maven-project.xsd-1_0-BRANCH.patch, xdocs-artifactId-version2.patch,
xdocs-artifactId.patch
>
>
> After some discussion on the dev-list "pom.id versus pom.artifactId - which is correct?"
there seems to be some inconsistencies in the 1.0 release.
> The discussion resulted in the following conclusions:
> 1. The element project.id should be removed from the XML schema
> 2. The element project.artifactId should be added to the XML schema
> 3. Documentation needs to be updated to reflect the above issues
> 1 and 2 should probably be done by one of the core developers, including decisions regarding
version numbers for the XML schema. I can make a patch for it if you think that's ok.
> I can make patches for the xdocs to fix 3. On which branch should I create the patches?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message