maven-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anders Hammar (JIRA)" <j...@codehaus.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (MEV-653) Invalid signatures at central
Date Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:30:23 GMT

    [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=213663#action_213663
] 

Anders Hammar commented on MEV-653:
-----------------------------------

Brett and Wendy,

thanks for looking at this. I have no problem verifying the deployed poms wioth the ones in
svn. The problem is though that doing this locally for one company's use isn't good enough
I think. I currently have two customers that want to verify the signatures.

Would it be possible (out of a technical perspective) to replace the signatures on central?
I guess this could be done for the poms that are possible to verify without replacing them.
The jars would be more difficult to do this for...

So, I'm looking for a long term solution for everyone, not just for one specific customer.

> Invalid signatures at central
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: MEV-653
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-653
>             Project: Maven Evangelism
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Anders Hammar
>
> The signatures for these poms are invalid. This causes issues when setting up environments
that verify the signatures and is not good as all Apache artifacts is supposed to be signed
as I understand it. This pom is used as a parent by some artifacts which many Maven plugins
use. Here's an example:
> maven-compiler-plugin:2.1 depends on maven-toolchain:1.0 which has maven:2.0.6 as parent.
> I asked Jason van Zyl about this as it is (supposedly) he who signed and he says he lost
that key and revoked it. Hence the signature should fail. However, the weird thing is that
org.apache.maven:maven-script:2.0.6 was signed with the same key about the same time (part
of the same release?) and that signature is reported ok.
> I'd happily work with you to solve this. There are possibly more artifacts with invalid
signatures. However, I have to admit that I am no pgp expert.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message