[ https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=360504#comment-360504
]
Tibor Digana edited comment on SUREFIRE-1076 at 1/1/15 8:24 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
This cannot be fixed because it's in conflict with Javadoc:
If {@code includes} are also specified these patterns are appended.
Therefore assigned to surefire-3.0 in order to remember that the user should be able to implement
our interfaces by his own without introducing new configuration parameter.
was (Author: tibor17):
This cannot be fixed because it's in conflict with Javadoc:
If {@code includes} are also specified these patterns are appended.
Therefore assigned to surefire-3.0 in order to remember that the use might be able to implement
our interfaces by his own without introducing new configuration parameter.
> Allow includesFile/excludesFile to override includes/excludes
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SUREFIRE-1076
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-1076
> Project: Maven Surefire
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Maven Surefire Plugin
> Affects Versions: 2.17
> Reporter: Micha? Piekarczyk
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently, the documentation for "includesFile" parameter states:
> > If includes are also specified these patterns are appended.
> It would be useful to have a parameter to make the includesFile override the includes
list.
> When an user has a list of tests that need to be run after some change (which may also
be quite large) the "test" parameter is inconvenient. A file with the whole list is easier
to use, but currently that requires pom reconfiguration. With this parameter it would be possible
to do this with just the command line options.
> Also, a user property for includesFile / excludesFile would make it even neater.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.6#6162)
|