mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io>
Subject Re: Review Request 45419: Cleaned up ModuleManager.
Date Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:24:38 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45419/#review125911
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!





src/module/manager.cpp (lines 41 - 42)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/45419/#comment188813>

    Should we use the following instead?
    ```
        namespace mesos {
        namespace module {
    ```
    
    Although there is no consistensy in the code base, the above format seems to be used more
often :).


- Kapil Arya


On March 29, 2016, 11:41 a.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45419/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 29, 2016, 11:41 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Kapil Arya.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Removes unused includes and usings from the ModuleManager.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/module/manager.hpp 9944af0 
>   src/module/manager.cpp 8c9aaf7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45419/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Till Toenshoff
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message