mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Rukletsov <ruklet...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 49556: Removed the health check binary.
Date Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:05:26 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49556/#review146937
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Alexander Rukletsov


On Aug. 26, 2016, 11:04 a.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49556/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 26, 2016, 11:04 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Benjamin Mahler, Gastón Kleiman, Gilbert
Song, Jie Yu, and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5955
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5955
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> With https://reviews.apache.org/r/49389/ and 
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49555/, both command and
> docker executors use health checks via the library. Hence
> the  mesos-health-check binary is not necessary anymore.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt ccd9892f5327a70f001411faf3199329f12cd472 
>   src/Makefile.am 69e56551f0adca6d6a9811cafea9a8d3c56d1df9 
>   src/health-check/CMakeLists.txt 69e9566a0571220e21c82156b814f61e17802352 
>   src/health-check/main.cpp 5346e30d35d4c5c2c4d181eee739ac8ce690a8e1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49556/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message