mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benjamin Bannier <benjamin.bann...@mesosphere.io>
Subject Re: Review Request 53435: Fixed header include order.
Date Fri, 04 Nov 2016 16:06:59 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/#review154925
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp (lines 33 - 34)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/#comment224712>

    That's what I understood, but I made an error in my comment: in that ordering it should
be at the same level as `runtime.hpp` since both of these a 6 levels deep. Currently `linux.hpp`
is preceeded by headers 7 levels deep.
    
    I seems this ruleis rather complicated in pratice.


- Benjamin Bannier


On Nov. 4, 2016, 4:15 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 4, 2016, 4:15 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixed header include order.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/containerizer/docker_volume_isolator_tests.cpp ca7bffd3b1773a11a4679d114885d3edd977b02b

>   src/tests/containerizer/mesos_containerizer_tests.cpp 4df537747d84daa68c29e2d05b22fa386a4a16db

> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53435/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message