> On March 2, 2017, 9:21 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> > src/common/roles.cpp
> > Line 71 (original), 71 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/57166/diff/1/?file=1652003#file1652003line72>
> >
> > Why can't role start with a slash? According to the design doc, it seems the
role like `/eng/frontend` is valid.
>
> Neil Conway wrote:
> Qian, this aspect of the hierarchical role design has changed since the design doc
was initially proposed. The design doc has been partially updated -- I'll finish updating
it shortly. The basic idea is that the syntax for hierarchical roles will just be an extension
to the current syntax -- i.e., hierarchical role names will look like `eng/dev` and `eng/prod`,
not `/eng/dev`.
Thanks Neil for the clarification. But with this new design, the role name is more like a
relative path rather than an absolute path, but I guess what we need is an absolute one, so
when framework tries to register a role like `eng/dev`, we will always assume it is an absolute
one (i.e., `eng` is root role), right?
- Qian
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57166/#review167623
-----------------------------------------------------------
On March 3, 2017, 2:12 a.m., Neil Conway wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57166/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated March 3, 2017, 2:12 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier and Michael Park.
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Role names can now contain forward slashes. Each component in a role
> name must now be validated separately.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/common/roles.cpp 31774a9b8f99f5efeed35b1c3e3486e05ca00f6a
> src/tests/role_tests.cpp 77f3d46a544a51ba71476e2f0735bb32758dd9e1
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57166/diff/2/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> `make check`
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Neil Conway
>
>
|