mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mesos Reviewbot Windows <revi...@mesos.apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 69098: Added a benchmark to compare quota and nonquota allocation performance.
Date Thu, 06 Dec 2018 01:21:18 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/#review211073
-----------------------------------------------------------



PASS: Mesos patch 69098 was successfully built and tested.

Reviews applied: `['69092', '69093', '69094', '69096', '69097', '69098']`

All the build artifacts available at: http://dcos-win.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com/artifacts/mesos-reviewbot-testing/2673/mesos-review-69098

- Mesos Reviewbot Windows


On Oct. 22, 2018, 3:39 p.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 22, 2018, 3:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Gastón Kleiman.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6630
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6630
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This benchmark evaluates the performance difference between nonquota
> and quota settings. In both settings, the same allocations are made
> for fair comparison. In particular, since the agent will always be
> allocated as a whole in nonquota settings, we should also avoid
> agent chopping in quota setting as well. Thus in this benchmark,
> quotas are only set to be multiples of whole agent resources.
> This is also why we have this dedicated benchmark for comparison
> rather than extending the existing quota benchmarks (which involves
> agent chopping).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_benchmarks.cpp 6c6330e8cdbc705be322a7e2445b295c35ee6952

> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69098/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Result from optimized build on a multicore 2.2GHz machine:
> 
> Benchmark setup: 20 agents, 10 roles, 20 frameworks
> Made 20 allocations in 3.508676ms for nonquota roles
> Made 20 allocations in 7.901269ms for quota roles
> 
> Benchmark setup: 200 agents, 100 roles, 200 frameworks
> Made 200 allocations in 63.407391ms for nonquota roles
> Made 200 allocations in 279.002319ms for quota roles
> 
> Benchmark setup: 2000 agents, 1000 roles, 2000 frameworks
> Made 2000 allocations in 4.003802373secs for nonquota roles
> Made 2000 allocations in 20.503188535secs for quota roles
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Meng Zhu
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message