metron-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mmiklavc <>
Subject [GitHub] metron pull request #530: METRON-777 Metron Extension System and Parser Exte...
Date Tue, 20 Jun 2017 21:07:35 GMT
Github user mmiklavc commented on a diff in the pull request:
    --- Diff: metron-analytics/metron-maas-service/ ---
    @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ Now that we have a deployed model, let's adjust the configurations
for the Squid
     * Edit the squid parser configuration at `$METRON_HOME/config/zookeeper/parsers/squid.json`
in your favorite text editor and add a new FieldTransformation to indicate a threat alert
based on the model (note the addition of `is_malicious` and `is_alert`):
    -  "parserClassName": "org.apache.metron.parsers.GrokParser",
    +  "parserClassName": "org.apache.metron.parsers.grok.GrokParser",
    --- End diff --
    I noticed GrokParser and CSVParser remain in the metron-parsers project. Is there a general
rule of thumb for what would be considered general vs what should become a parser-extension?
My intuition here says that since Grok and CSV are more abstract concepts, they're kept in
metron-parsers while more concrete implementations of those types are realized as extensions,
e.g. squid is Grok. Is that your thinking here as well?

If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.

View raw message