metron-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Quick Dev
Date Mon, 09 Oct 2017 12:39:00 GMT
Created METRON-1239 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1239> to
track this.

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Simon Elliston Ball <
simon@simonellistonball.com> wrote:

> I think the codelab build might be more Metron archeologist!
>
> +1 to a big old clearout, especially on the wiki.
>
> > On 6 Oct 2017, at 13:57, Nick Allen <nick@nickallen.org> wrote:
> >
> > I doubt it has been run in a long, long time.  It was originally created
> > for some Meetups that we did early on in the project.  Useful then, but
> not
> > any longer.  It might have even predated Quick Dev.
> >
> > FYI - We have an opening for Metron Team Historian.  Send a cover letter,
> > CV and $150 application fee to me for consideration. :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:52 AM Justin Leet <justinjleet@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> What is the point of that anyway? It just looks like full dev with no
> >> skipTags? That seems like it should just be documented that you can run
> >> with Vagrant with '--ansible-skip-tags'? We probably should document any
> >> tags you might want to skip anyway.
> >>
> >> I'm pretty in favor of killing that.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Nick Allen <nick@nickallen.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The same case might be made for the Code Lab Platform
> >>> `metron-deployment/vagrant/codelab-platform`?
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:44 AM Justin Leet <justinjleet@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Wiki updated.  It now points to full dev and the link just says "Dev
> >>>> Platform"
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Nick Allen <nick@nickallen.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 To killing Quick Dev and updating the Wiki.  Quick Dev has been
> >>> broken
> >>>>> for eons.  Simon's point about "profusion of installs" makes a lot
of
> >>>> sense
> >>>>> too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:33 AM Simon Elliston Ball <
> >>>>> simon@simonellistonball.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 we see a lot of people struggling with the profusion of install
> >>> and
> >>>>> run
> >>>>>> methods as it is, if we can reduce that surface area, life will
be
> >> a
> >>>> lot
> >>>>>> easier on the user list.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 6 Oct 2017, at 13:28, Zeolla@GMail.com <zeolla@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I say we kill it and repoint the site.  That will give us
one
> >> less
> >>>>> thing
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> upgrade to centos 7 as well.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jon
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017, 08:27 Justin Leet <justinjleet@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So what are we going to do with Quick Dev?  I'm pretty
sure
> >>>>> everybody's
> >>>>>>>> been using full dev for awhile now (and quick dev is
probably
> >>> broken
> >>>>>> since
> >>>>>>>> I'm sure we haven't been regularly updating it).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I just realized our website links to a wiki page that
says to
> >> use
> >>>>> quick
> >>>>>>>> dev.  Given that quick dev is broken or behind or both,
this is
> >>>> going
> >>>>>> to be
> >>>>>>>> incredibly confusing and misleading to anyone wandering
in.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A short term fix is to just point that wiki page to
full dev, so
> >>> we
> >>>>>> aren't
> >>>>>>>> at least broken to anyone coming in.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> After that we should figure out what we're doing with
quick and
> >>> full
> >>>>> dev
> >>>>>>>> and take care of whatever needs to be done.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Justin
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jon
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message