metron-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Quick Dev
Date Fri, 06 Oct 2017 12:51:56 GMT
What is the point of that anyway? It just looks like full dev with no
skipTags? That seems like it should just be documented that you can run
with Vagrant with '--ansible-skip-tags'? We probably should document any
tags you might want to skip anyway.

I'm pretty in favor of killing that.

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Nick Allen <nick@nickallen.org> wrote:

> The same case might be made for the Code Lab Platform
> `metron-deployment/vagrant/codelab-platform`?
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:44 AM Justin Leet <justinjleet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Wiki updated.  It now points to full dev and the link just says "Dev
> > Platform"
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Nick Allen <nick@nickallen.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 To killing Quick Dev and updating the Wiki.  Quick Dev has been
> broken
> > > for eons.  Simon's point about "profusion of installs" makes a lot of
> > sense
> > > too.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:33 AM Simon Elliston Ball <
> > > simon@simonellistonball.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 we see a lot of people struggling with the profusion of install
> and
> > > run
> > > > methods as it is, if we can reduce that surface area, life will be a
> > lot
> > > > easier on the user list.
> > > >
> > > > > On 6 Oct 2017, at 13:28, Zeolla@GMail.com <zeolla@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I say we kill it and repoint the site.  That will give us one less
> > > thing
> > > > to
> > > > > upgrade to centos 7 as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jon
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017, 08:27 Justin Leet <justinjleet@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> So what are we going to do with Quick Dev?  I'm pretty sure
> > > everybody's
> > > > >> been using full dev for awhile now (and quick dev is probably
> broken
> > > > since
> > > > >> I'm sure we haven't been regularly updating it).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I just realized our website links to a wiki page that says to
use
> > > quick
> > > > >> dev.  Given that quick dev is broken or behind or both, this
is
> > going
> > > > to be
> > > > >> incredibly confusing and misleading to anyone wandering in.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> A short term fix is to just point that wiki page to full dev,
so
> we
> > > > aren't
> > > > >> at least broken to anyone coming in.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> After that we should figure out what we're doing with quick and
> full
> > > dev
> > > > >> and take care of whatever needs to be done.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thoughts?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Justin
> > > > >>
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Jon
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message