mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeroen Brattinga" <jeroen.bratti...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Docs? Please?
Date Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:18:35 GMT
You're right. I've signed up for Confluence and will send the fax to help
correct this issue. Documentation is -by far- the biggest stumbling block
for Mina. It almost put me off in the beginning; I'm still glad I stuck
though :-)

Jeroen Brattinga

2006/10/29, Jeff Schnitzer <jeff@infohazard.org>:
> Just to inject a quick reality-check...
> No matter what you want to call your next version, the existing 1.0
> release is fatally broken.
> The code seems to be fine, but both the packaged docs and the online
> documentation describe something significantly different from the
> software included in the release.  I can't tell if the docs describe an
> older version of the software or a newer version of the software.
> We'd really like to convert our popular SMTP server library
> (http://subethasmtp.tigris.org/) over to MINA but the threading
> explanation seems to be wildly off.  It's a shame because MINA looks
> great and we've already converted over the postfix tcptables
> implementation in SubEtha Mail.  The library is great - you'd probably
> get 10X more adoption if the docs weren't obviously wrong.
> Thanks,
> Jeff
> P.S.  Just because I can't resist bicycle sheds... the even/odd release
> numbering is dumb.  Everyone who has ever used a Microsoft product
> (read: everyone) knows that X.0 releases are far less stable and mature
> than X.1 releases.  Just call it 2.0 and release it soon - with correct
> docs and all jar dependencies.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message