mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ashish Sharma" <ashishonl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: grizzly versus mina
Date Fri, 25 May 2007 11:43:57 GMT
its strange to see how x vs y wars can generate so many responses.

if they are good we can adapt, if we are good we have nothing to worry.

On 5/25/07, Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> On 5/25/07, Holger Hoffstaette <holger@wizards.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2007 08:45:34 +0900, Trustin Lee wrote:
> >
> > > The HEAD revision of AsyncWeb highly depends on MINA and had significant
> > > performance improvement.  It seems like they used older release (or
> didn't
> > > use a lightweight asyncweb example).  Moreover, I don't think MINA
> doesn't
> > > have any noticeably big margin for improvement in performance, at least
> > > from the following performance test report.
> > >
> > > http://mina.apache.org/performance-test-reports.html
> >
> > That's a fantastic report! However it would be fair to the poor old Apache
> > if you enabled mod_cache and used a newer version (2.2) with a threaded
> > mpm - I assume you ran the worker model? While that is popular for
> > deployments for many good reasons, it's not a fair comparison to what Mina
> > does.
> > Other than that keep up the great work :)
>
> Thanks for pointing out the issues with my tests.  I'd like to run the
> test again with more powerful machines and update the report someday.
>
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
>

Mime
View raw message