mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Heath <mhe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [AsyncWeb] Need an async client now
Date Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:37:22 GMT
The new logging features in SLF4J and removing IoSessionLogger were what
was holding up an M1 release.  Where do we stand on the logging front
right now?

-Mike

Maarten Bosteels wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2008 9:05 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Feb 10, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Maarten Bosteels wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Feb 10, 2008 5:28 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is it ready?  You're only at M1.  What are the next milestones
>>>> planned
>>>> before you hit beta?
>>>
>>> The version numbering scheme is described at the bottom of
>>> http://mina.apache.org/downloads.html [1]
>>>
>>> IMO we should have created 2.0-M0 a few months ago. But for some
>>> reason we
>>> have been postponing it as long as there were open JIRA issues that
>>> could
>>> require an API change.
>>>
>>> According to [1] we are allowed to make API changes between M1 and M2
>>> but of course it's nicer for the user if we can avoid it.
>>>
>>> I just had a look at JIRA at there were more open issues than I
>>> thought (6)
>>> but no show-stoppers AFAICS.
>>>
>>> Maybe we should have a vote about cutting 2.0-M0 ?
>> Maybe I'm being dense.  You mean 2.0-RC1?  When do you guys cut a
>> branch to stabilize your beta?  Does it depend on the situation?
>>
> 
> Good question.
> 
> In my very humble opinion "cutting 2-0-M1" means :
> (a) creating a 2.0 branch
> and
> (b) creating a 2.0-M1 tag
> 
> All further development for 2.0 would then happen on the 2.0 branch instead
> of on the trunk.
> Isn't that the usual way to proceed ?
> 
> Maarten
> 
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
> 


Mime
View raw message