mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From peter royal <pro...@apache.org>
Subject Re: MINA and prebinding of privileged ports
Date Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:22:05 GMT
On Feb 25, 2008, at 12:55 PM, David Connelly wrote:
>> How about just a variant on bind() that takes a ServerSocket(Channel)
>> rather than an IP/port combination?
> This is essentially what I had done except I called this new method  
> 'register' rather than 'bind' in order to reflect that the server  
> socket had been previously bound, but either method name is fine by  
> me. I also think this would be the simplest solution in terms of  
> ease of use.

ah, good point. its already bound :)

>> As Trustin said, we can put it into the core for 2.x, but 1.1.x is
>> just in maintenance mode until we can get 2.0 out. (realizing the  
>> pain
>> it causes to continue to have delays). But do post a patch!
> I understand this is probably too late for 1.1.x so we'll keep using  
> our patched version in the meantime until 2.0 ships. If I file a  
> JIRA issue as Trustin suggests should I include the patch there or  
> should I post it separately?

include the patch in the jira issue please, as there's an important  
checkbox there that says you're making the contribution under the  
terms of the ASLv2.

> Finally, I also wanted to thank both you and Trustin for the quick  
> response!

thanks for being a user!


(peter.royal|osi)@pobox.com - http://fotap.org/~osi

View raw message