mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sangjin Lee" <sjl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Date Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:05:57 GMT
+1
Regards,
Sangjin

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>
wrote:

> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId.  Since there is no 1.0
> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId.
>
> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and is the
> reason I chimed in.  I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice home
> here.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <trustin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Sounds like a good idea.  I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId
> > with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition
> > (and less pollution in our Maven repository :).  What do you think about
> > moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox?  I'm fine with
> > releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite (i.e.
> > client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
> >
> >
> > Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >
> > > Exactly, a clear demarcation.  It's really G AHC in it's new home.
> > > Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the
> > > new
> > > stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's
> > > built
> > > on MINA 2.0 goodness.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > >
> > >  Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version?  Or
> > > > you
> > > > want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
> > > >
> > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > > 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>:
> > > >
> > > >  Yep, that's it.
> > > > >
> > > > > The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under
> > > > > 1.0 of
> > > > > it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
> > > > > of
> > > > > the new
> > > > > client that Mike et al are working on.  This would be 2.0 and
> > > > > written
> > > > > from
> > > > > "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Alan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it's this:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... 
We
> > > > > > discussed
> > > > > > making it a branch of asyncweb.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Sangjin
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
> > > > > > list@toolazydogs.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Where do I look in the headers?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Alan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <
> > > > > > > trustin@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Uh.. did we?  Could you tell me the message ID so I can
> > > > > > > re-read the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  related thread?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The discussion that took place earlier was that this
would
> > > > > > > > be our
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > v1.0
> > > > > > > > > release of Async client in the Mina project,
IIRC.  I
> > > > > > > > > think it
> > > > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > > needs to be put to a vote.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Alan
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin
Lee)
> > > > > > > > > <trustin@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find
out the
> > > > > > > > > best way
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >  merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb).  WDYT?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Rick McGuire wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo
sandbox
> > > > > > > > > > appear
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > settled down, so I think now would
be a good time to
> > > > > > > > > > > move it
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > the Mina
> > > > > > > > > > > project if everybody agrees.  Where
would be the
> > > > > > > > > > > appropriate
> > > > > > > > > > > place
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > put this client?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Rick
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >  --
> > > > > > > > > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer,
JBoss, Red
> > > > > > > > > > Hat
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > what we call human nature is actually human
habit
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >  --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss,
Red Hat
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > --
> > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > --
> > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > --
> > http://gleamynode.net/
> >
> >
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message