mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Webb" <elihusma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [About the Filter Chain] Proposals
Date Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:41:21 GMT
I agree that we should not 'slaughter' the current code since we are
getting close to a final 2.0 release.

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark Webb wrote:
>> After letting the dust settle on this thread, I can say that I agree
>> with what Alex is saying.  I think a 2-way system makes complete
>> sense.
> Ok. We then will create a branch named mina-new-chain then, in which we will
> experiment. Be ready for some bad butchering :)
>> One great interest I have in this is how will it work with
>> containers such as Spring.  I have been using MINA with Spring alot
>> lately and want to make sure we keep this support in our system.
> Having some feedback on how you are using MINA with Spring could be
> interesting. Atm, we have some coupling with xbean which is quite complex to
> decipher, and this is certainly not something we want to break...
> Maybe a thread discussing MINA + Spring could help a lot to avoid big
> mistakes to be done while refactoring the code.
> But keep in mind that we can't afford to slaughter MINA current code as we
> are using it in ADS, and we don't really want to re-implement from scratch
> everything we have done, so trust me on that, we are going to be very
> cautious !
> Thanks !
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org

View raw message