mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julien Vermillard <jvermill...@archean.fr>
Subject Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Date Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:16:04 GMT
Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700,
Jeff Genender <jgenender@savoirtech.com> a écrit :

> 
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > IMO it's  dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all
> > the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release.
> > it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an
> > updated/cleaned website.
> > 
> 
> So lets do that ;-)
> 
> Jeff
> 

I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website
(removing all the old 1.X references).

> 
> 
> > Julien
> > 
> > Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700,
> > Jeff Genender <jgenender@apache.org> a écrit :
> > 
> >> May I ask why this must be a RC2?  I think the 2.0 series has gone
> >> on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version.  Thats why we
> >> can release 2.0.1, etc.  Also... folks have issues with 2.0
> >> release because the dot oh have negative connotations.  IMHO, lets
> >> get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes.
> >> 
> >> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast
> >> it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again.
> >> 
> >> Thoughts?
> >> 
> >> Jeff
> >> 
> >> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too :
> >>> 
> >>> DIRMINA-738    Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a
> >>> WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs
> >>> DIRMINA-379    setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in
> >>> Windows Vista
> >>> DIRMINA-724    getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all
> >>> sessions closed
> >>> 
> >>> I think we should at least check the first one before launching
> >>> a vote...
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Julien Vermillard a écrit :
> >>>> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100,
> >>>> Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues
> >>>>> so far :
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Bug  DIRMINA-539    NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the
> >>>>> TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
> >>>>> Impr DIRMINA-682    We need a better documentation for the  
> >>>>> ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block
> >>>>> until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
> >>>>> Impr DIRMINA-593    Javadoc & documentation for
> >>>>> org/apache/mina/ filter/reqres
> >>>>> Task DIRMINA-477    Update page about differences between 1.x
> >>>>> and 2.x
> >>>>> Task DIRMINA-708    Unbound thread growth on discovery
> >>>>> attempts : Improve documentation
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my
> >>>>> opinion is that we are ready for a release.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA
> >>>>> version and launch a vote ?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> -- 
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Cordialement,
> >>> Emmanuel Lécharny
> >>> www.nextury.com
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Julien Vermillard
> > 
> > Archean Technologies
> > http://www.archean.fr
> 


-- 
Julien Vermillard

Archean Technologies
http://www.archean.fr

Mime
View raw message