mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel LŽcharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [MINA 3.0] Logging filter was Re: [MINA 3.0] Which filters should we keep ?
Date Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:52:54 GMT
Niklas Gustavsson a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> That raise a slight issue here : with slf4j, we have no way to tell the
>> underlying framework that it should switch to some specific level, for
>> instance. Quite a dead end, so far :/
>>     
>
> As mentioned, I don't think this is in scope for MINA. If the user,
> for example has chosen to use log4j, he would do this using the log4j
> API (in which slf4j will create a logger). We do not need to care.
>   
right.
>   
>> The way it was done in MINA was awfull : the log level ws always set to
>> debug, and we overriden this level with our own level :
>>
>> if ( requestedLevel == DEBUG ) {
>>  Log.debug( blah );
>> }
>>     
>
> Yes, I agree that it is unfortunate that slf4j do not provide a
> generic log(Level, String) method in the same way as log4j. Given
> Ceki's great knowledge in this area, I presume it's for good reasons.
> However, another solution would be to allow the user to inject his own
> logger into the logging filter.
>   
I think that CLog does not support level setting, it's probably why 
SLF4J does not allow such an operation.

We can also provide a Log4jLoggingFilter and a LogBackLogging Filter too...
> /niklas
>
>   


Mime
View raw message