mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel LŽcharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What various priorities mean in Mina's Jira was: Toward 2.0-RC2/2.0.0 : status
Date Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:50:58 GMT
Alan D. Cabrera a écrit :
> On Jan 13, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Emmanuel LŽcharny wrote:
>> Alan D. Cabrera a écrit :
>>> On Jan 13, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
>>>> Le Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:10:21 -0800,
>>>> "Alan D. Cabrera" <list@toolazydogs.com> a écrit :
>>>>> I was wondering, what does the various priorities mean in Mina's 
>>>>> Jira?
>>>> Well nothing special.
>>> :)
>>> The reason that I asked was that it would be nice if one could look 
>>> at the roadmap and discover what the group thought needed to be 
>>> fixed before a release could happen.  It would also be nice to look 
>>> at the roadmap and be able to pick out those issues that are being 
>>> time-boxed and potentially left out of the release.
>> This is what I'm currently doing. There are many issues in the 
>> 'unscheduled' state which needs to be moved to a version in the 
>> roadmap, and also many JIRA's priority need to be set to the correct 
>> level. I agree that some missing Javadoc can be set to critical, as 
>> soon as it's not considered as a bug, and also that uf some log 
>> generates a NPE, hen t shuld not be considered as critical.
>> I'm currently processing the bug list to update those informations.
> Sorry, I'm not prescribing what we should do for this release but am 
> trying to make more concrete what the various priorities mean in 
> Mina's Jira.  Jullien's reply implied, to me, that there was none and 
> that it was not important.  My reply addressed this personal perception.

I would say that there are none, yep, but IMO, it's important to 
moderate them and attribute the correct priority to JIRAs in the close 

View raw message