mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: What various priorities mean in Mina's Jira was: Toward 2.0-RC2/2.0.0 : status
Date Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:42:31 GMT

On Jan 13, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Emmanuel LŽcharny wrote:

> Alan D. Cabrera a écrit :
>> On Jan 13, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
>>> Le Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:10:21 -0800,
>>> "Alan D. Cabrera" <list@toolazydogs.com> a écrit :
>>>> I was wondering, what does the various priorities mean in Mina's  
>>>> Jira?
>>> Well nothing special.
>> :)
>> The reason that I asked was that it would be nice if one could look  
>> at the roadmap and discover what the group thought needed to be  
>> fixed before a release could happen.  It would also be nice to look  
>> at the roadmap and be able to pick out those issues that are being  
>> time-boxed and potentially left out of the release.
> This is what I'm currently doing. There are many issues in the  
> 'unscheduled' state which needs to be moved to a version in the  
> roadmap, and also many JIRA's priority need to be set to the correct  
> level. I agree that some missing Javadoc can be set to critical, as  
> soon as it's not considered as a bug, and also that uf some log  
> generates a NPE, hen t shuld not be considered as critical.
> I'm currently processing the bug list to update those informations.

Sorry, I'm not prescribing what we should do for this release but am  
trying to make more concrete what the various priorities mean in  
Mina's Jira.  Jullien's reply implied, to me, that there was none and  
that it was not important.  My reply addressed this personal perception.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message