mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: RC1, RC2, etc
Date Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:04:40 GMT
Cool.  I think we should rename 2.0.0-RC2 to 2.0.0 to better  
communicate that intention.  WDYT?


Regards,
Alan

On Jan 9, 2010, at 6:01 AM, Ashish wrote:

> The understanding is correct :-)
>
> We are just few steps away from GA, pending some bugs to be fixed
> without which we can't release GA.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Alan D. Cabrera  
> <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> I was talking to someone about Mina and he thought that it was odd  
>> that 2.0
>> was out for so long under RC*.  To my mind, I agree.  Usually, in my
>> experience, release candidates are time boxed pre-releases that  
>> allow people
>> to coordinate specific testing before the real release.
>>
>> Can someone explain the rational for RC*?  Just curious.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> thanks
> ashish
>
> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message