mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Re : What about releasing a 2.0-RC2/2.0.0 ?
Date Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:09:05 GMT
I looked at the issue and don't follow what the problem is.  I can't  
even find the tests.


Regards,
Alan

On Jan 12, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:

> I'm sorry but after examining the remaining bug list i think https://issues..apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-711

>  must be fixed before issuing 2.0.0 the framework can't fail because  
> we just add some logs otherwise we must make this mdc feature  
> optionnal
>
> I'm really in favor of releasing 2.0.0 and creating dynamicity in  
> the community let just fix 711
>
> -1 (for a short moment i hope)
> Cordialement, Regards,
> -Edouard De Oliveira-
> Blog: http://tedorgwp.free.fr
> WebSite: http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
>
>
>
> ----- Message d'origine ----
> De : Julien Vermillard <jvermillard@archean.fr>
> À : dev@mina.apache.org
> Envoyé le : Mar 12 Janvier 2010, 18 h 35 min 01 s
> Objet : Re: What about releasing a 2.0-RC2/2.0.0 ?
>
> Le Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:02:41 +0100,
> Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> We have fixed some important issues lately in 2.0-RC1 :
>> DIRMINA-749 : We cannot anymore inject more than one CODEC in the
>> chain. DIRMINA-678 : NioProcessor 100% CPU usage on Linux (epoll
>> selector bug) DIRMINA-650 : Mina server does not recieve all data
>> sent by client using SSLSocketFactory
>>
>> Isn't it time for a new release ? Should we call it 2.0.0 ?
>>
>
> +1
>
>
> -- 
> Julien Vermillard
>
> Archean Technologies
> http://www.archean.fr
>
>
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message