mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ashish <paliwalash...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Date Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:40:37 GMT
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Julien Vermillard
<jvermillard@archean.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
> IMO it's  dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the
> PR stuff implying the 2.0 release.
> it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an
> updated/cleaned website.

Sorry ! didn't get much :-(

Can we list down what all we need to do like cleanup and other stuff,
so that its easy.

One thing I can think off is moving out the 1.0 documentation to achieve.

Sorry for the dumb question :-)

> Julien
>
> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700,
> Jeff Genender <jgenender@apache.org> a écrit :
>
>> May I ask why this must be a RC2?  I think the 2.0 series has gone
>> on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version.  Thats why we
>> can release 2.0.1, etc.  Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release
>> because the dot oh have negative connotations.  IMHO, lets get a
>> real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes.
>>
>> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast
>> it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>
>> > Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too :
>> >
>> > DIRMINA-738    Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a
>> > WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs
>> > DIRMINA-379    setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in
>> > Windows Vista
>> > DIRMINA-724    getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all
>> > sessions closed
>> >
>> > I think we should at least check the first one before launching a
>> > vote...
>> >
>> >
>> > Julien Vermillard a écrit :
>> >> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100,
>> >> Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> >>

Mime
View raw message