mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julien Vermillard <jvermill...@archean.fr>
Subject Re: [MINA 3.0] Acceptor/Connector
Date Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:50:26 GMT
Le Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:17:49 +0530,
Ashish <paliwalashish@gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Julien Vermillard
> <jvermillard@archean.fr> wrote:
> > Le Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:10:12 +0530,
> > Ashish <paliwalashish@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> >> <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi guys,
> >> >
> >> > since day one, I found that Acceptor/Connector are technical
> >> > names, not user friendly names.
> >> >
> >> > Let's face the real world : we are not developping Acceptors, not
> >> > Connectors, but Servers and Clients. Can't we rename those two
> >> > guys to IoServer and IoClient instead of IoAcceptor and
> >> > IoConnector ?
> >> >
> >> > I know this is just cosmetic, but if it helps people to
> >> > understand the kind of objects they are manipulating, I think it
> >> > would worth the change...
> >> >
> >> > thoughts ?
> >> >
> >>
> >> +1 on name change
> >>
> >> Have a little hesitation with IoServer/IoClient, it kindof gives an
> >> impression of complete implementation, but don't have a better
> >> suggestion either
> >>
> >
> > an IoServier With an IoHandler and the chain is a complete
> > implementation no ?
> >
> > --
> > Julien Vermillard
> 
> hmm.. yeah didn't thought this way.. :-)
> 
> Hey are we planning this in 2.0 or 3.0?

in 3.0 because 2.0 API is frozen

-- 
Julien Vermillard

Archean Technologies
http://www.archean.fr

Mime
View raw message