mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ashish <paliwalash...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Last version on trunk may have issues
Date Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:15:24 GMT
Will try this on W$ once I get back home in couple of hrs.

thanks
ashish

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi gys,
>
> yesturday I tried to fix the Datagram bug (DIRMINA-732). I think it works on
> linux, I have no idea for windows (if someone can give it a try), and I know
> it fails on Mac OSX.
>
> The problem is that if we register the 'any' address (0.0.0.0) on a datagram
> acceptor, and try to get a session from it, like the way it's done on the
> failng test :
>
> ..
>        InetSocketAddress bindAddress = new InetSocketAddress(
>  AvailablePortFinder.getNextAvailable());
>        acceptor.setHandler(new TestHandler());
>        acceptor.bind(bindAddress);
>        IoSession session = acceptor.newSession(new InetSocketAddress(
>                "127.0.0.1", AvailablePortFinder.getNextAvailable()),
> bindAddress);
> ...
>
> we get an error, as the bindAddress is considered as a Inet4Address, when
> the acceptor is bound on a Inet6Address. As we store the address in a
> hashMap to check if they are equals, we have an issue, because whatever you
> do, a Inet4Address will always be different from a Inet6Address; I hacked
> the code atrociously by using a String translation for this address, but it
> does not work on Mac.
>
> Now, I'm dubious about the test. Why should be grab a session from the
> acceptor ?
> If someone has some idea about what's wrong about this test, that would be
> great !
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.nextury.com
>
>
>



-- 
thanks
ashish

Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal

Mime
View raw message