mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ConnectFuture confusion
Date Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:45:02 GMT
On 3/1/10 6:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
>> On 3/1/10 6:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/1/10 4:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ashish wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unless it breaks the system, i would say lets not loose our sleep

>>>>>> over this.
>>>>>
>>>>> While I share the same opinion about the IoFuture hierarchy as you 
>>>>> I have the same sentiments as Ashish.
>>>> I'm afraid that we might have to fix the issue in 2.0.... Trust me, 
>>>> i'm not pleased with this !
>>>
>>> Fixing a bug is one thing.  Reorganizing a code base a few days 
>>> after an attempted vote on its initial release is another.
>>
>> I know :/ This is why I created a branch, in a desesperate attempt to 
>> get rid of all those futures, instead of doing that in trunk. Now, it 
>> was the end of a long and painful week, chasing many bugs in many 
>> places, and I was turning in circle.
>>
>> I *wish* we can fix the bug, without having to rewrite this part.
>
> Another alternative is to totally abandon 2.x.  It was never 
> officially released.  Just leave it as it is and work on the new 2.x
I'm also considering this option...

-- 

Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel L├ęcharny
www.nextury.com



Mime
View raw message