mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2
Date Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:51:10 GMT

On Sep 21, 2010, at 1:44 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:

> On 9/21/10 5:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>> 
>>> On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>> On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>>> All I did was
>>>> 
>>>> mvn rat:check -fn
>>> To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the report from target/site/rat-report.html,
which I did.
>>> 
>>> Summary
>>> -------
>>> Notes: 0
>>> Binaries: 4
>>> Archives: 0
>>> Standards: 639
>>> 
>>> Apache Licensed: 613
>>> Generated Documents: 0
>>> 
>>> JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
>>> Generated files do not required license headers
>>> 
>>> 26 Unknown Licenses
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> There are some missing ASL header in the following files :
>>> 
>>> !????? mina-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/proxy/utils/MD4.java
>>> !????? mina-core/src/test/java/org/apache/mina/core/service/AbstractIoServiceTest.java
>>> !????? mina-core/src/test/java/org/apache/mina/filter/logging/LoadTestMdcInjectionFilter.java
>>> !????? mina-legal/src/main/resources/notices.xml
>>> 
>>> Should we abort the release once more for those 4 files, two of them having been
added whiel I was fighting with Maven, or can we wait for a 2.0.1 ?
>>> 
>>> Frankly, I would rather release a 2.0.1 immediately than going through the 2.0.0
vote again.
>>> 
>>> wdyt ?
>> It's my understanding that those files are required to have an ASL header before
a release can happen.
> I can fix them, build a release, and launch the vote again, but with a shortest delay,
maybe, assuming that this will be the only modifications...

Sounds good.  I don't have any other tests other than building and getting rat to pass.


Regards,
Alan


Mime
View raw message