mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SSHD-149) Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible?
Date Tue, 22 May 2012 13:23:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13280936#comment-13280936

Guillaume Nodet commented on SSHD-149:

Sure, good idea.
> Is separation of sftp subsystem interfaces possible?
> ----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: SSHD-149
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-149
>             Project: MINA SSHD
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Stefan Rönisch
> We'd like to use the mina sshd sftp funtionallity.
> I've to validate, if this product fits our needs.
> As far as I saw until now it looks great.
> But we've to support some special requirements.
> - We have to support a special proxy solution for dmz which handles ssh encryption and
authentication. So we need to use the sftpsubsystem without ssh encryption. Unfortunately,
there are some method signatures which avoid this.
> - We have to manipulate sftp command results in some cases. For example we like trigger
internal processes after getting a file, but if triggering the process fails the sftp command
result should signal an error.
> Is there a chance that our needs will be considered?
> And when a solution could be expected?

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message