mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ashish <paliwalash...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] MINA 3.0.0-M2
Date Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:52:33 GMT
Got it :)

+1


On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Julien Vermillard
<jvermillard@gmail.com>wrote:

> SLF4J is MIT licensed, so no need of NOTICE (but it's in the LICENSE
> file) http://slf4j.org/license.html
>
> same for protobuf :
> http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/trunk/COPYING.txt
> --
> Julien Vermillard :::: http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Ashish <paliwalashish@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Build runs fine.
> >
> > Just one thing the binary pkg Notice should have mention of SLF4J and
> > protobufs rt?
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Le 7/27/13 11:40 AM, sebb a écrit :
> >> > On 27 July 2013 09:38, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >> On nexus, we have too many things in
> >> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-027/org/apache/mina/mina-parent/3.0.0-M2/
> >> ,
> >> >> like the zip for sources. It does not make any sense to have that.
> >> > It's quite tricky avoiding that when using Maven.
> >>
> >> We don't store the parent's sources in Directory :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/directory/api/apache-ldap-api/1.0.0-M19/
> >>
> >> I've to check how we do that...
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Cordialement,
> >> Emmanuel Lécharny
> >> www.iktek.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > thanks
> > ashish
> >
> > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>



-- 
thanks
ashish

Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message