mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff MAURY <jeffma...@jeffmaury.com>
Subject Review DIRMINA-994
Date Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:15:01 GMT

upon Emmanuel's request, I reviewed the fix for DIRMINA-994
(commit f1972fc3de8c4074ff7b60f8c557d3c53013e30b). Here are my remarks:

   - the Future framework in MINA2 is not linked in any form to JDK's
   Future, is there any reason for that ? I've seen that IOFuture in MINA3
   extends Future
   - Regarding MINA3, I suggest that IOFuture's implementation should
   benefit from helper class AbstractQueuedSynchronizer (
   As MINA3 Future framework is linked to the JDK Future framework, the change
   should be quite small and simple. I will open a JIRA for that


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message