mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 1.2.0
Date Thu, 31 Mar 2016 21:15:53 GMT
2016-03-31 15:13 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@gmail.com>:

> Le 31/03/16 09:15, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
> > We're still missing a few binding votes ....
>
> Damn.. Totally missed the last votes :/
>
>
> I have tested the package, and teh first time I got an error :
>
> Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.098
> sec <<< FAILURE! - in
>
> org.apache.sshd.client.subsystem.sftp.extensions.helpers.CopyDataExtensionImplTest
> testCopyDataExtension[size=8,192, readOffset=4,096, readLength=2,048,
>
> writeOffset=4,096](org.apache.sshd.client.subsystem.sftp.extensions.helpers.CopyDataExtensionImplTest)
> Time elapsed: 5.014 sec  <<< ERROR!
> org.apache.sshd.common.SshException: Failed to get operation result
> within specified timeout: 5000
>     at
>
> org.apache.sshd.client.subsystem.sftp.extensions.helpers.CopyDataExtensionImplTest.testCopyDataExtension(CopyDataExtensionImplTest.java:174)
>     at
>
> org.apache.sshd.client.subsystem.sftp.extensions.helpers.CopyDataExtensionImplTest.testCopyDataExtension(CopyDataExtensionImplTest.java:135)
>     at
>
> org.apache.sshd.client.subsystem.sftp.extensions.helpers.CopyDataExtensionImplTest.testCopyDataExtension(CopyDataExtensionImplTest.java:121)
>
>
>
> Re-running it twice, both were successful.
>

Not sure if this is an environmental problem or not.  Lyor, any idea ?


>
> Otherwise, I think there is a missing Copyright for jcraft, which is
> part of the dependencies :
>
> "JZlib 0.0.* were released under the GNU LGPL license.  Later, we have
> switched
> over to a BSD-style license.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Copyright (c) 2000,2001,2002,2003 ymnk, JCraft,Inc. All rights reserved.
>
> Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
>
>   1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
>      this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>
>   2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>      notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
>      the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> distribution.
> "
>
>
> I know this should have been detected before, and that I (and many
> others) haven't check that for years... Am I wrong ?
>
>
Those dependencies are not distributed in any distribution, so I don't
really see why their copyright / notice should be included.


-- 
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Red Hat, Open Source Integration

Email: gnodet@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message