nifi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Adding 'apache-' to our artifact names
Date Sun, 15 Mar 2015 03:49:13 GMT
Does anyone know of other projects that do this?

The standard post-incubator trademark guidelines already will have people
saying "Apache NiFi" for the first reference in a document. That's plenty
IMO.

Also, we're still incubator, which means we have to caveat any claims to
the ASF marks.

-- 
Sean
On Mar 14, 2015 9:58 PM, "Joe Witt" <joe.witt@gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> We received feedback from an IPMC member who gave us a +1 on the vote
> for 0.0.2 but provided what he called minor/trivial feedback.  The
> statement he made was:
>
> "Consider adding apache to source artefact names for possible extra
> legal protection / branding"
>
> This concept is discussed briefly in this section [1].
>
> I had personally already seen this guidance and decided not to add it
> as we were putting artifacts in initially.  My reasoning was:
>  -  It is not required and of unclear value
>  - It adds an additional seven characters to artifact names which are
> often already quite long
>  - We already have a maven group name of 'org.apache.nifi'
>  - it didn't appear to me to be common practice among other projects
>
> What does cause me to think twice about this though is this IPMC
> member does a great job of reviewing releases and providing thoughtful
> and very detailed feedback.
>
> So I'd just like us to have a good consensus on this one.
>
> If anyone feels strongly that we should add 'apache-' to our artifact
> names please advise.
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#naming
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message