nifi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Release wrangling: 1 week until our hopeful 0.4.0 release
Date Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:42:07 GMT
re: NIFI-1165 I also have a windows 7 laptop I can test on. (though it is
low power)

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Aldrin Piri <aldrinpiri@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have another set of eyes for NIFI-748.  Will do so now.
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Tony Kurc <trkurc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For those not watching commits@nifi
> > I need another set of eyes on the review for NIFI-748
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Joe Witt <joe.witt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > NIFI-1082 (this should move to next release unless a resolution is
> > > imminent)
> > >
> > > NIFI-1108 (move to next release)
> > >
> > > NIFI-1139 (recommend moving to 0.5.0)
> > >
> > > NIFI-1164 (this should get fixed now - it makes builds unreliable)
> > >
> > > NIFI-1165 (should tackle now.  have a windows laptop i can build on)
> > >
> > > Thanks for pushing tony.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Tony Kurc <trkurc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Update:
> > > >
> > > > Presumably fixed by NIFI-1086 (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting
> > > revision
> > > > NIFI-61
> > > > NIFI-812
> > > > NIFI-980
> > > > NIFI-1009
> > > > NIFI-1086
> > > > NIFI-1133
> > > >
> > > > Multiple Auths (Matt Gilman) no patch yet, making progress
> > > > NIFI-655
> > > >
> > > > Provenance Search Improvement (Oleg Zhurakousky) PR in, being
> reviewed
> > by
> > > > Tony Kurc
> > > > NIFI-748
> > > >
> > > > Create a Getting Started Guide (Mark Payne) Review complete, being
> > merged
> > > > in by Tony Kurc
> > > > NIFI-973
> > > >
> > > > Line ending fix (Tony Kurc) Finger hovering over "go" button
> > > > NIFI-1054
> > > >
> > > > ExecuteStreamCommand (Joe Percivall). Reviewed, awaiting revision
> > > > NIFI-1081
> > > >
> > > > Provenance repository search (Mark Payne) original patch reverted,
> new
> > > > patch in development? Move to 0.5.0?
> > > > NIFI-1082
> > > >
> > > > Scrub code looking for @InputRequirement consistency (Mark Payne) -
> not
> > > > sure how to attack this one
> > > > NIFI-1108
> > > >
> > > > * NEW *
> > > > LogAttribute processor fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - trivial fix? but
> > breaking
> > > > change? I recommend moving to 0.5.0
> > > > NIFI-1139
> > > >
> > > > * NEW *
> > > > Race condition Fix (Oleg Zhurakousky) - assigned but no patch. Move
> to
> > > > 0.5.0 or 0.4.1?
> > > > NIFI-1164
> > > >
> > > > * NEW *
> > > > Build on windows failing (Joe Percivall) - assigned but no patch. I
> can
> > > dig
> > > > in. (I submitted a requst for MSDN, but can take 8 weeks)
> > > > NIFI-1165
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Aldrin Piri <aldrinpiri@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Scanned through and removed the 0.4.0 tagging for State Management.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for the suggestion.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Has anyone had a chance to do a pass through Feature Proposals
to
> > move
> > > >> out
> > > >> > any that aren't going to make 0.4.0?
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/NiFi+Feature+Proposals
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Tony Kurc <trkurc@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-61 - awaiting
an
> > answer
> > > >> > before
> > > >> > > patch can be completed
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-655 - Based on
> feature
> > > >> branch
> > > >> > > activity, is close?
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-696 - awaiting
a
> patch
> > > >> > marking
> > > >> > > method as deprecated (assigned to me, but if someone else
wants
> to
> > > take
> > > >> > it
> > > >> > > and I review, thats cool too)
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-812 -  a bit
> confused
> > > about
> > > >> > > this
> > > >> > > one. patch in NIFI-1086 will close this?
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-973 - awaiting
> review?
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-980 - (see 812
> > > confusion)
> > > >> > > presumably closed when NIFI-1086 is closed
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1009 (same!)
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1054 I'm at the
> ready
> > to
> > > >> > submit
> > > >> > > a patch at the 11th hour. .gitattributes may be a candidate
for
> > > 0.5.0
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1073 - some bug
> fixes
> > > >> > awaiting
> > > >> > > review. if we don't have review bandwidth can be pushed
to next
> > > release
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1081 - reviewed,
> > > probably
> > > >> > needs
> > > >> > > revision. Presuming the revisions can be done
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1082 - Unclear
as to
> > > >> status.
> > > >> > Is
> > > >> > > this awaiting review?
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1086 - Seems
like
> this
> > > is
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > lynchpin for several tickets, probably should be a priority
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1097 - Awaiting
> > review?
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1108 - Awaiting
> > comment
> > > >> from
> > > >> > > Mark Payne.
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1109 - awaiting
a
> > merge
> > > to
> > > >> > > master?
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1127 - awaiting
> > review?
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1132 - awaiting
> review
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1133 - awaiting
> review
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1153 - awaiting
> review
> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1155 - blocker
bug
> > > awaiting
> > > >> > > patch
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Seems like we're in good shape. I will have some review
> bandwidth
> > > this
> > > >> > > evening, so if you start reviewing, please note that in
the
> jiras.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Can we get answers for 1108 and 61 and contemplate a slip
to
> > 0.5.0?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Tony
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Sean
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Sean

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message