nifi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre Villard <pierre.villard...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: FlattenJson
Date Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:26:47 GMT
No I do see how this could be convenient in some cases. My comment was
more: you can certainly submit a PR for that feature, but it'll need to be
clearly documented using the appropriate annotations, documentation, and
property descriptions.

2018-03-20 10:20 GMT+01:00 Jorge Machado <jomach@me.com>:

> Hi Pierre, I’m aware of that. So This means the change would not be
> accepted correct ?
>
> Regards
>
> Jorge Machado
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 20 Mar 2018, at 09:54, Pierre Villard <pierre.villard.fr@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jorge,
> >
> > I think this should be carefully documented to remind users that the
> > attributes are in memory. Doing what you propose would mean having in
> > memory the full content of the flow file as long as the flow file is
> > processed in the workflow (unless you remove attributes using
> > UpdateAttributes).
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> > 2018-03-20 7:55 GMT+01:00 Jorge Machado <jomach@me.com>:
> >
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> I would like to change the FlattenJson Procerssor to be possible to
> >> Flatten to the attributes instead of Only to content. Is this a good
> Idea ?
> >> would the PR be accepted ?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Jorge Machado
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message