nifi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox
Date Sat, 08 Dec 2018 12:44:11 GMT
+1

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <sivaprasanna246@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <jvwing@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1, thanks for volunteering.
> >
> > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <kdoran.apache@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <alopresto@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >    +1.
> > >
> > >    Andy LoPresto
> > >    alopresto@apache.org
> > >    alopresto.apache@gmail.com
> > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69
> > >
> > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <aldrinpiri@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hey folks,
> > >>
> > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the deprecation of
> our
> > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos that
> committers
> > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and
> transitioning
> > to
> > >> GitBox [2].
> > >>
> > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional change,
> only
> > in
> > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion over this
> > topic
> > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some of the
> > logistics
> > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so was never
> > >> executed.
> > >>
> > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The process
> > looks to
> > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result in
> requiring
> > >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip based remotes.
> > >>
> > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite INFRA ticket
> and
> > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community to make
> this
> > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to perform this
> > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass migration
> > that
> > >> would happen later.
> > >>
> > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice bit of
> > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and, given my
> > prior
> > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
> > >>
> > >> --aldrin
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> > >> [3]
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message