nutch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (NUTCH-392) OutputFormat implementations should pass on Progressable
Date Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:17:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500951
] 

Andrzej Bialecki  commented on NUTCH-392:
-----------------------------------------

I don't think it's a good idea, it's creating too many cryptic options ... Average users won't
be able to assess what are the best choices there, and advanced users are able to change this
directly in the source anyway ...

> OutputFormat implementations should pass on Progressable
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-392
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-392
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: fetcher
>            Reporter: Doug Cutting
>            Assignee: Andrzej Bialecki 
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>         Attachments: NUTCH-392.patch
>
>
> OutputFormat implementations should pass the Progressable they are passed to underlying
SequenceFile implementations.  This will keep reduce tasks from timing out when block writes
are slow.  This issue depends on http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-636.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message