nutch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sishen <yedingd...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Why is Nutch not involved in Google Summer of Code - 2008?
Date Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:04:13 GMT
I'm also looking forward to solr integration to nutch.

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:39 AM, All day coders <rac.nosotros@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well Susam I agree with you. I can dedicate some time to the POST
> based authentication(something i've been working on).
>
> Also, i've noticed there's no book about nutch, which makes things
> extremely hard  if you want to dive in.  Well, I know it takes time to
> do such a thing but maybe we can put our efforts to create something
> closer to it.
>
> So, here are the things I miss the most:
>
> - Supported Solr Integration
> - POST based authentication
>
> Regards,
>           Yoanis
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/22/08, Susam Pal <susam.pal@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering why Nutch project is not involved in Google SoC:
> > http://code.google.com/soc/2008/ Many Apache projects including
> > Commons, Hadoop and Mahout have put up the ideas here:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2008
> >
> > Wouldn't it be great to have students helping the project out with
> > some of the work which noone has found time for? For example, many
> > people have requested for a POST based authentication support in
> > Nutch. I personally wanted to do it after adding HTTP Authentication
> > Schemes, but unfortunately I could never manage my time well to do it
> > since it would require a good deal of effort. I am sure, there are
> > many such ideas which have not been done because the contributors did
> > not get time. IMHO, it would be great if students are given
> > opportunity to contribute through GSoC 2008. The mentors can guide
> > them through the work for a few hours every week and some valuable
> > work can be done. What do you say?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Susam Pal
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message