nutch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sebastian Nagel <wastl.na...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Nutch 2.0 RC2
Date Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:51:53 GMT
+1
with a documentation issue about the dependencies:

> simply copy its HBase core lib from the HBase installation into the
> local/lib directory. This works for me.
Removing lib/hbase-0.90.4.jar and copying hbase-0.94.jar from the HBase installation
into lib/ caused a
 Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
    org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HColumnDescriptor.setMaxVersions(I)V
Which version of HBase are you using?

> After building rc2 with ivy-enabled HBase, it seems a test HBase jar is
> deployed in local/lib, even though it's called hbase-0.90.4.jar.
In my case, it's definitely HBase 0.90.4

Trying to run Nutch with hbase-0.90.4.jar and HBase 0.94 installed
also failed (see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-user/201201.mbox/%3CCADcMMgHNTcEzSxEt=boYt5xr-UMu4t5QyfeaS2LRQuBV4_T2rg@mail.gmail.com%3E).

>From the wiki:
> (N.B. Gora 0.2 uses HBase 0.90.4, however the setup is known to work
> with more recent versions of HBase.)
We should specify which versions are definitely working when following the
procedure in the tutorial. It's not the user's task to try it out.

Sebastian


On 06/18/2012 12:27 PM, Ferdy Galema wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Tested it with HBase but there is a slight issue with the dependencies.
> After building rc2 with ivy-enabled HBase, it seems a test HBase jar is
> deployed in local/lib, even though it's called hbase-0.90.4.jar. (I do not
> know yet how this is caused!) But since a user should have a separate HBase
> installation anyway, I don't think it's a blocker for now. A user should
> simply copy its HBase core lib from the HBase installation into the
> local/lib directory. This works for me. We should add this to
> http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/GORA_HBase (btw does anyone know why I cannot
> edit this one anymore?)
> 
> Crawling/parsing works fine after the workaround, so +1 from me. If anyone
> disagrees with the above, I'm fine with that too and fixing it prior to
> releasing.
> 
> Ferdy
> 
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Julien Nioche <
> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Lewis
>>
>> The tests still fail but will be fixed with
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1399 and I don't think it is
>> a blocker.
>> The signatures are fine and the content of the Maven repo looks OK .
>>
>> +1 for releasing
>>
>> Thanks a lot.
>>
>> Julien
>>
>>
>> On 15 June 2012 13:48, lewis john mcgibbney <lewismc@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> A candidate for the Apache Nutch 2.0 RC2 is available at:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/apache-nutch-2.0rc2
>>>
>>> The release candidate is a src.zip and src.tar.gz ONLY
>>> archive of the sources in:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-2.0rc2
>>>
>>> We release Nutch 2.0 in this fashion due to the inclusion of
>>> Apache Gora and the likelihood that users will regularly recompile
>>> the code to suit dynamic requirements.
>>>
>>> Further, a staged Maven repository of the 2.0 jar, sources.jar and
>>> javadoc.jar is available here:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-244/
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 2.0.
>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>>> least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast.
>>>
>>>  [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 2.0
>>>  [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>
>>> Many Thanks and heres to plenty more.
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Lewis
>>>
>>> P.S. Here's my +1.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *
>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>>
>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
>>
>>
> 


Mime
View raw message