nutch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sebastian Nagel <wastl.na...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: VOTE Apache Nutch 2.0 RC1
Date Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:52:47 GMT
 > We only supply src distributions...
> Does this principle apply to Nutch 2 as well?
Maybe, yes.
The situation with the current binary package is uncomfortable:
I had to copy/link gora-hbase and hbase jars into lib/ to get nutch running.

2012/6/13 Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>

> Hi Guys,
>
> Whilst updating the Nutch2Tutorial I got thinking that within Gora we
> don't supply binary distributions of the code, this is because when using
> Gora a user may wish/require to recompile the code to accomodate config
> changes etc. We only supply src distributions...
>
> Does this principle apply to Nutch 2 as well? I mean, what if your using
> the gora-sql dependency, then you wish to switch to HBase and recompile, is
> this possible within the binary distribution?
>
> Best
>
> Lewis
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Julien Nioche <
> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ferdy
>>
>>>
>>> The Nutch job jar is not present in the binary archive. This means
>>> distributed running of jobs is not supported. I'm not sure if this is a
>>> problem (since users can always build one themselves), merely pointing it
>>> out. The recently released 1.5 also lacks this job jar, so at least no
>>> difference there.
>>>
>>
>> The binary distrib corresponds to runtime/local and as such should NOT
>> have the job file there. This is now the norm since 1.5
>>
>> Will try and do some testing of the RC
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Julien
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *
>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>>
>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>
>

Mime
View raw message