nutch-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (NUTCH-2441) ARG_SEGMENT usage
Date Wed, 10 Jan 2018 01:44:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319535#comment-16319535
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NUTCH-2441:
---------------------------------------

lewismc commented on issue #250: fix for NUTCH-2441 ARG_SEGMENT fix for REST API
URL: https://github.com/apache/nutch/pull/250#issuecomment-356472303
 
 
   @okedoki can you please update to master and format and I will merge into master? Thank
you

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


> ARG_SEGMENT usage
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-2441
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2441
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: metadata
>    Affects Versions: 1.13
>            Reporter: Semyon Semyonov
>             Fix For: 1.15
>
>         Attachments: metadataARG_SEGMENT.patch
>
>
> The class metadata/Nutch.java  public static final String ARG_SEGMENT = "segment" is
not used correctly. In some cases Fetcher and ParseSegment it is interpreted as a single segmenet,
in others CrawlDb, LinkDb, IndexingJob as an array of segments. Such misunderstanding leads
to inconsistency of usage of the parameter.
> After a discussion with [~wastl-nagel]  the proposed solution is to allow the usage of
both array and a string in all cases. That gives an opportunity to not introduce the broken
changes.
> A path is proposed.
>  *The question left is refactoring, all these five components share the same code(two
versions of the same code to be precise). Shouldn't we extract a method and reduce duplicates?
 *



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message