ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lance Waterman" <lance.water...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: are we really gonna end up with 1 engine anyway?
Date Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:15:26 GMT
Thanks Paul - I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. I know
its tough trying to hit a moving spec ;)


On 2/23/06, Paul Brown <paulrbrown@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Lance --
> > I can see how the BpelIfActivityState maps into the bom (
> SwitchActivityImpl
> > ), however I'm a bit lost on <forEach> and <repeatUntil>. I don't see
> parser
> > classes for these constructs nor do I see them registered in
> BpelGraph_2_0.
> If they're not in BpelGraph_2_0, then they weren't in on the last pass
> over the spec.  It's not difficult to add the pieces to the
> bpel-parser and bom modules for new activities.  Adding the right bits
> to the compiler and VM infrastructure is a little more involved but
> also not too difficult if you've got the Zen down.  That said, I'm
> reasonably sure that Maciej and company have been holding off on
> adding them to the compiler pipeline until, e.g., 242 and 243 are
> settled.  (The precise behavior of scopes vis a vis iteration needs to
> be clarified before the runtime semantics can be implemented.)
> -- Paul

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message