ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Boisvert" <boisv...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: Ode Performance: Round I
Date Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:48:12 GMT
On 6/6/07, Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> wrote:
> But exactly why would an in-memory process ever be serialized? That should
> be down to 0%.

I think that's pretty much what Matthieu was saying;  there's a quick & easy
optimization to be made here that's not dependent on refactoring
thread/transaction demarcation.

It's persistence processes where we should find strategies to improve
> performance/scalability by reducing serialization cost.

Yep, the flyweight pattern <http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?FlyweightPattern> would
be most efficient here (also suggested by Matthieu in different words)


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message