ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Maciej Szefler" <...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: BART branch merge
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:28:31 GMT
If you have a custom IL, then there will be some small changes
(for the better), otherwise there's no user-visible differences.

-mbs

On 8/31/07, Paul Brown <paulrbrown@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 to get it merged into trunk and baked.  Sounds like good material
> for a 1.2 release.  Are there any incompatibilities introduced, i.e.,
> will someone's 1.1 setup work (without modification) in 1.2?
>
> -- Paul
>
> On 8/31/07, Maciej Szefler <mbs@intalio.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With 1.1 all spiced and cured, I'd like to merge BART branch into the
> trunk.
> > As a a reminder (its been a while) the BART branch is a refactor of the
> > engine that provides several benefits:
> >
> > 1. Simplified integration -- in particular it is no longer necessary to
> > start transactions in the IL in order to interface with ODE
> > 2. Support for three different "invocation styles": Unreliable (the
> simple,
> > no tx no guarantees style), Reliable (transacted transport, useful for
> > WS-RM, JMS, and the like), and Transacted (supports atomic invocations).
> > 3. Performance -- caching of instance state to eliminate unnecessary
> > database reads, reuse of message objects in p2p invocations, elimination
> of
> > unnecessary transactions, elimination of unnecessary context switches (
> i.e .
> > sequential instance work gets done by the same thread).
> >
> > Any objects, comments, suggestions are appreciated.
> >
> > -maciej
> >
>
>
> --
> paulrbrown@gmail.com
> http://mult.ifario.us/
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message