ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Milinda Pathirage" <milinda.pathir...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Ode and GSoC
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:05:30 GMT
Hi Alex,

Thank you for your quick response. I'll try the JDK 1.5 with buildr.

Thanks
Milinda


On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Alex Boisvert <boisvert@intalio.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Milinda Pathirage <
> milinda.pathirage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I did some experiments with jQuery and lift web frame work (Sorry for
> the
> > late reply). I think jQuery will be a better choice for the client side.
> > But
> > I have some doubts about using lift on the server side.
> > As I understand there are disadvantages as well as disadvantages. As
> Alex
> > mentioned in the previous mail
> >  - Deploying Lift webapps is the same as any Java .war file, so it
> should
> > be
> > instantly familiar to our existing user base.
> >  - forward-thinking web frameworks are a more fertile learning grounds
> > than
> > yesterday's technology (referring specifically to Java/JSPs)
> > are advantages.
> >
> > But this will increase the number of dependencies. When thinking about
> > dependencies, we have to lift with ODE or ask users to install it and
> also
> > have to have Scala install in development machines.
>
>
> Yes, more dependencies.  Regardless of the solution, I think one should be
> able to build Ode without the Console, and vice-versa.
>
> Also according to my experience we can develop web interface by only using
> > AJAX and Web Services exposed specially for management related tasks
> > (Currently we have Management API, but if we need more functionality we
> > need
> > to improve it). AJAX with Web Services technique is used in WSO2 WSAS
> > AFIAK.
>
>
> Yes, that's also possible but requires a bigger dose of Javascript.
>
>
> > Also I think it's better if we can introduce some authentication and
> > authorization mechanism to this management interface. By doing this e
> can
> > limit functionalities for different user groups. Like admin can
> > start/retire
> > process models but normal users can't. But when using this we  have
> think
> > about how we manage sessions and few security related things.
>
>
> Agreed.
>
>
> > Also I have problems with buildr build system in Linux (Ubuntu 7.10).
> > Currently I am using binary distribution. It's better if some one can
> add
> > some more documentation or FAQ about these build problems. At one time
> > when
> > buildr is successfully started in my machine, the rake build system
> crash
> > with segmentation fault :(.
>
>
> This is most likely because you're using JDK 6 or installing Buildr with
> JDK6 as your default JVM.  Buildr doesn't work on JDK6 yet because of one
> of
> its dependencies (rjb).  The documentation for Buildr 1.3 (coming soon)
> has
> a better installation/troubleshooting guide.
>
> alex
>



-- 
http://inf-dimensions.blogspot.com "Infinite Dimensions"
http://wsaxc.blogspot.com "Web Services With Axis2/C"

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message