ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Milinda Pathirage" <milinda.pathir...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [gsoc] Monitoring Console / Architecture
Date Fri, 16 May 2008 19:17:27 GMT
Hi,
Please find my comments inline.

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Paul Brown <paulrbrown@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On May 16, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Milinda Pathirage wrote:
>
>> [...] If we use Atom API, I think we can implement a API like Google Data
>> API :).
>> Frankly, I don't have any experience with pros and cons of these
>> technologies.
>>
>
> I don't know what Atom would do for us, and even if it does something, I
> have a feeling that it's orthogonal to an AJAXy management console.  (I can
> see Atom as a way to publish a stream of events out of the engine, but we'd
> need to either fix a presentation in (X)HTML or extend Atom.)
>
> Someone kick me if I'm not seeing something.
>
>  [...] I think it's better we can first define the API in whatever the way
>> (Web
>> Services or REST) and then go for the UI. While defining API and implement
>> it we can give a very basic level of Management interface by using
>> currently
>> available Web Service based API. Then we can identify the issues with the
>> WS-* based API and also can discover more and more requirements.
>>
>
> Let's get a list of features laid out that we can prioritize and rate for
> difficulty; then we can think about API/UI to support them.
>
I think this approach will be better and I am +1 for that.

Thanks
Milinda

>
> -- Paul
>



-- 
http://mpathirage.com
http://wso2.org "Oxygen for Web Service Developers"
http://wsaxc.blogspot.com "Web Services With Axis2/C"

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message